Snow leopards, long regarded as one of the world’s most secretive predators, may be facing a genetic crisis. A new study by Stanford University biologists shows that their genetic similarity could put the entire species at risk if their environment changes significantly.
Researchers found that snow leopards have the lowest genetic diversity of any big cat, including the cheetah. This means that even small environmental disturbances, such as shifts in temperature or habitat loss, could threaten their survival.
Lead author Catherine Andrea Solari, a biologist at Stanford University, said in a statement, “Snow leopards live in extremely remote, untouched areas. Their numbers and genetic diversity are limited. Therefore, they are ill-prepared to cope with environmental changes over time.”
Species with Limited Genetic Variety
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), examined the genomes of 41 snow leopards. Of these, 35 were wild and six lived in zoos. It is the largest genetic study ever conducted on the species.
Before this research, scientists had access to only four complete snow leopard genomes. Samples for the study came from 11 countries across Central and South Asia.
The findings show that the species has remained genetically stable for thousands of years. Unlike other large cats that suffered sharp population declines, known as “bottlenecks”, snow leopards have always existed in small, isolated groups.
Because of this stability, their harmful mutations have been gradually removed by natural selection. As a result, the remaining population is relatively healthy, despite its small size.
But that same genetic stability now makes them vulnerable. When a population has little genetic variation, it has fewer ways to adapt to changing conditions such as climate shifts or new diseases.
Snow leopards live in some of the harshest regions on Earth, the high mountains of Asia. They inhabit areas across 12 countries, including Mongolia, China, India, Pakistan, and Nepal. These regions are now warming faster than almost any other part of the Northern Hemisphere.
As glaciers melt and vegetation zones shift upward, the leopards’ mountain prey, mainly blue sheep and ibex, move to new areas. This pushes snow leopards into smaller territories and raises the risk of conflict with humans.
Although the current estimated population ranges between 4,700 and 7,500 individuals, that number has remained uncertain for years. Tracking these animals is difficult because they live in remote terrain and avoid human contact.
Most Homogeneous Big Cat
Genetic analysis shows that snow leopards are divided into three broad groups. One population lives in Mongolia and Russia, another in Kyrgyzstan, and a third across Tajikistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
Despite this regional separation, the differences between these groups are minor. Scientists say this means there is still some genetic exchange among them, but not enough to create strong local variations.
In genetic terms, snow leopards are more uniform than cheetahs, long considered the least diverse of the big cats. While cheetahs lost much of their genetic variety after two population crashes thousands of years ago, snow leopards never had large populations to begin with.
“We see a species that has always existed in small numbers,” said Solari. “They have adapted to survive in extreme conditions, but they lack the genetic tools to respond quickly to new challenges.”
Healthier Genes, Smaller Populations
Despite their low diversity, the study found that snow leopards carry fewer harmful mutations than other big cats such as lions or leopards. This suggests that weak genes were gradually removed over many generations.
This process, known as “purging,” helped the species maintain genetic health even in small populations. But it came at a cost, fewer genetic options for future adaptation.
The study used advanced genome sequencing to reconstruct the species’ history over nearly a million years. Results show that snow leopards’ effective population size never exceeded 28,000 individuals. During the last ice age, their numbers likely dropped to about 6,000.
The researchers found little evidence of inbreeding, but they warned that the species’ genetic uniformity could make it hard to recover if populations start to shrink due to human or environmental pressure.
What It Means for Conservation
Snow leopards were classified as Endangered for more than four decades before being downlisted to Vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 2017. Some scientists criticised that decision, saying it underestimated the risks facing the species.
This new study may reignite that debate.
“Our findings suggest that snow leopards are more genetically fragile than previously thought,” said Solari. “Their survival depends on stable habitats. If those change, their ability to adapt is limited.”
Petrov added that even though snow leopards live far from cities, they are not safe from global trends. “Climate change affects the most remote places on Earth. We are seeing it in the Himalayas, the Pamirs, and the Tien Shan mountains,” he said.
The researchers warn that rising temperatures, mining, and expanding infrastructure could fragment their remaining habitats. This isolation could increase the risk of local extinction.
Role in Mountain Ecosystems
Snow leopards play an important role in mountain ecosystems. They control the populations of wild herbivores such as blue sheep and ibex. Without them, prey numbers could rise, leading to overgrazing and soil erosion in fragile alpine environments.
To improve monitoring, researchers are developing non-invasive methods to study snow leopards. One approach involves extracting DNA from fecal samples. This allows scientists to analyze genetic material without capturing or disturbing the animals.
The team hopes that this technique will help track population changes and identify unique genetic traits that may exist in isolated regions.
Zoos around the world keep about 500 snow leopards, most descended from wild-caught individuals from the 1960s to 1990s. But the study found that captive populations represent only a narrow portion of the species’ genetic diversity.
The North American zoo population, for example, largely descends from animals originally captured in Kyrgyzstan. This means it does not reflect the full genetic range found in the wild.
“Zoos should not be seen as a backup for the species’ genetic diversity,” said Solari. “Their breeding populations are too limited to capture the range of genetic variation that exists across the wild populations.”
What Lies Ahead
Researchers stress that the survival of snow leopards will depend on maintaining habitat connectivity and reducing human threats.
They recommend protecting corridors between mountain ranges to allow gene flow between populations. They also call for more cooperation among the 12 countries that share snow leopard habitats.
The study’s findings present a clear warning: even species living in remote wilderness are not immune to global environmental shifts.
With fewer than 8,000 individuals left and one of the narrowest genetic bases among big cats, the snow leopard’s future depends on how quickly humans act to protect the world’s high mountains.
As Solari put it, “These animals have survived for thousands of years in the harshest conditions on Earth. But their genes tell us they cannot face major changes alone.”
Support us to keep independent environmental journalism alive in India.
Keep Reading
Highway Halt Puts Kashmir’s Fruit Economy at Risk
MP brings back Bhavantar as farmers lose soybean harvests
Stay connected with Ground Report for underreported environmental stories.
Follow us onX, Instagram, and Facebook; share your thoughts at greport2018@gmail.com; subscribe to our weekly newsletter for deep dives from the margins; join our WhatsApp community for real-time updates; and catch our video reports on YouTube.
Your support amplifies voices too often overlooked, thank you for being part of the movement.
