...
Skip to content

Haldwani protest: Supreme Court stays HC’s eviction order

Haldwani protest: Supreme Court stays HC’s eviction order
Haldwani protest: Supreme Court stays HC’s eviction order

REPORTED BY

Follow our coverage on Google News

The Supreme Court has put a stay on the Uttarakhand High Court’s decision to run an ‘encroachment removal campaign’ from railway land in the Banbhulpura area of Haldwani.

A bench consisting of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Abhay S Oka approved the order and sent the matter for hearing on February 7, calling on the state and the Railways to find a “practical solution” to what it called a “human problem”.

“Thousands of people cannot be uprooted overnight, It is a human problem, some viable solution needs to be found,” the High Court said, stopping an order from the Uttarakhand High Court authorizing the eviction of nearly 50,000 people living in some 4,000 homes after a case that lasted for years.

Along with this, the Supreme Court has also issued a notice to the Government of Uttarakhand and the Indian Railways. In this case, the Uttarakhand High Court had ordered the eviction of people living on railway land, after which the administration had given eviction notices to 4,000 families.

“There cannot be an uprooting of 50,000 people overnight. There has to be a segregation of people who do not have rights to the land and the need for rehabilitation recognizing the need for railways”, affirmed the Supreme Court.

Excepting the High Court’s order ordering the occupants to be evicted within seven days, the high court noted that “50,000 people cannot be uprooted in 7 days”.

“We have listened to the wise advice of the parties. ASG has emphasized the need for railways. The moot point to consider is whether the entire land will be awarded to the railways or whether the state government claims a portion of the land. Apart from that, there are issues of squatters claiming rights to the land as tenants or auction buyers.

“We are on the way to the approval of the order since there cannot be an uprooting of 50,000 people in 7 days. A viable arrangement is needed to segregate those who may have rights/no rights alongside the rehabilitation schemes that already exist while recognizing the need for railways,” the bank said in its order.

The Supreme Court said that without deciding the rights of such a large number of people living there, they cannot be removed on the strength of the force.

Court has described this matter as a humanitarian problem. The Supreme Court said that some way should be found to remove and rehabilitate the encroachers there.

The Supreme Court said that the documents of the occupants of Banbhulpura should be examined as many of them had bought that land in the auction.

ALSO READ

Follow Ground Report for Climate Change and Under-Reported issues in India. Connect with us on FacebookTwitterKoo AppInstagramWhatsapp and YouTube. Write us on GReport2018@gmail.com.

Author

Support Ground Report to keep independent environmental journalism alive in India

We do deep on-ground reports on environmental, and related issues from the margins of India, with a particular focus on Madhya Pradesh, to inspire relevant interventions and solutions. 

We believe climate change should be the basis of current discourse, and our stories attempt to reflect the same.

Connect With Us

Send your feedback at greport2018@gmail.com

Newsletter

Subscribe our weekly free newsletter on Substack to get tailored content directly to your inbox.

When you pay, you ensure that we are able to produce on-ground underreported environmental stories and keep them free-to-read for those who can’t pay. In exchange, you get exclusive benefits.

Your support amplifies voices too often overlooked, thank you for being part of the movement.

EXPLORE MORE

LATEST

mORE GROUND REPORTS

Environment stories from the margins